
Whether one is concerned
about oil prices and foreign control of oil, or the generational
impact of carbon emissions and recent environmental calamities,
ethanol is all over the news. Perhaps it helps that
ethanol both burns clean removing carbon buildup while reducing
dependence on petroleum.
The environment has gotten increasingly more press since
carbon levels were first reported as having long-lasting implications. Back
in April (2007), there was talk of the Virgin Group and Al Gore teaming up to
create a contest for a carbon-negative process that sucks carbon emissions from
the air. A process for cellulosic ethanol can certainly reduce one’s
carbon footprint, but our process also removes it.
With the advent of cellulosic ethanol, there is even now
a plausible method of extracting vehicle fuel from municipal solid waste, further
adding to its long list of benefits. The catch is the amount of energy
to produce it. Most cellulosic processes only can make about 67% of what
it takes to produce corn ethanol. That number is the primary reason behind
slow changes in recent House Energy legislation and GM Flex-fuel production lines. No
one wants the risk of all of their eggs in one basket, until they hear about
our process.
Even plant biologists are saying “It’s not a
silver bullet.” In an early November interview
with Fareed Zakaria, Director of Plant Biology at Carnegie
Institute, by the name of Chris Somerville indicated that ethanol
is certainly important but it is still in question whether it
would |
be enough to provide all transportation
fuel. Corn
ethanol has an upper limit of 12 to 15 billion gallons that it
can contribute, leaving around an 83% gap in the market. However,
our numbers show that our process can produce as much as 87.6%
of the nation’s supply.
In the October issue of National Geographic, corn ethanol
shows promise in the fact it produces 22% less greenhouse emissions, but last
year it cost $1.09 per gallon in petroleum-based energy used to produce it. Growing
the corn takes massive amounts of water, nitrogen fertilizer, and diesel equipment,
not to mention creating an increase in feed prices due to the uneven economic
weight between fuel and grain. From this report, it is
believed there is no magic-bullet fuel crop that can solve the
American energy dilemma without impacting the economy and environment
in the process, except that our process utilizes trash and not
grain.
The Washington Post reported October 19 that microbes are
raising investor’s hopes and may provide both the cellulase and fermentation
needed for high enough yield. Now, Fuel for Freedom
has beaten Danisco-Genecor and SunEthanol to the punch by its
recent discovery and patenting its proprietary blend of microbes
and enzymes.
Fuel for Freedom proprietary process not only removes trash
with an environmentally safe method and product, but also depletes
carbon dioxide from the air to add additional ethanol yield,
while at the same time can be generated in sufficient quantity
to stave off economic and security concerns. Thus,
the magic bullet is not in a crop at all, it is the bugs beneath
our feet. |